当前位置：网站首页 » 观点 » 内容详情

案例征稿启示权威发布_扫一扫题目出答案(2024年12月精准访谈)

内容来源：AI全自动内容创作接口所属栏目：观点更新日期：2024-12-01

案例征稿启示

《未来建筑与城市研究》征稿启事 | Studies in Materialistic Historiography 「gooood谷徳设计网超话」「gooood建筑」征稿启事：唯物主义史学研究虚拟特刊客座编辑：迈克尔ⷦ𕷦–ﯼˆK. Michael Hays）《未来建筑与城市研究》邀请探索唯物主义历史编撰的案例和方法，通过细读研究对象及其可能性条件，超越对建筑、使用者身份和政治宣言的再现和模仿。我们认识到，尽管批判理论在20世纪90年代被所谓的文化研究所取代，这使得建筑和城市主义的社会紧迫感得以复苏，但新实用主义、身份政治、批判性的总结和新历史主义的实际结果却是回归日常、身体、决定性背景等旧人文主义主题，并普遍忽视且难以考察到社会想象中所铭刻的真实的唯物主义基础。在《未来建筑与城市研究》即将发布的数期中，我们设想在“唯物主义历史编撰”框架内构思和写作。我们欢迎理论与实践相结合的混合建构和模式，例如，对建筑项目的症候性阅读可以既关注事实，也关注气候变化的形式。在研究移民运动时，反思仅凭保留部分遗留痕迹的档案进行研究所存在的问题。我们期待有多种“异历史书写”——即其他形式的历史记录——来分析或质疑我们对当前问题的表述；扩展对当前历史实践的思考方式。 Call for Papers: Studies in Materialistic Historiography Virtual Special Issue Guest Editor: K. Michael Hays Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism invites explorations of the examples and methods of materialistic historiography which, through close readings of objects and their conditions of possibility, move beyond the merely representational and mimetic conception of buildings, user identities, and professed politics. We recognize that while the overtaking of critical theory by so-called cultural studies in the 1990s rejuvenated architecture and urbanism鈥檚 sense of social urgency, the actual result of neopragmatism, identity politics, extraction critique, and new historicism was the return to old humanist motifs of the everyday, the body, the determinant context, and the general ignoring of the actual materialistic basis of the social imaginary already inscribed but undetectable to these methods. For upcoming issues of Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism, we imagine writings conceived and produced in the frame of “materialistic historiography.” We welcome the possibility of hybrid constructions and models of theory and practice in which, for example, a symptomatic reading of an architectural project confronts not just the fact but the forms of climate change. Where a study of the movements of migration ponders the issue of research in an archive comprising only traces of things left behind. We hope for multiple “allo-history-graphics”—other iterations of historical inscription—that analyze or take issue with our formulation of the current problematic; that expand other ways of thinking about the present practice of history. How to submit and more：网页链接